| Meditations Before Mass by Romano Guardini
I Stillness
WHEN Holy Mass is properly
celebrated there are moments in which the voices of both priest and
faithful become silent. The priest continues to officiate as the
rubrics indicate, speaking very softly or refraining from vocal
prayer; the congregation follows in watchful, prayerful
participation.[1] What do these intervals of quiet signify? What
must we do with them? What does stillness really imply?
It implies above all that
speech end and silence prevail, that no other sounds of movements,
of turning pages, of coughing and throat-clearing be audible. There
is no need to exaggerate. Men live, and living things move; a forced
outward conformity is no better than restlessness. Nevertheless,
stillness is still, and it comes only if seriously desired. If we
value it, it brings us joy; if not, discomfort. People are often
heard to say: "But I can't help coughing" or "I can't
kneel quietly"; yet once stirred by a concert or lecture they
forget all about coughing and fidgeting. That stillness proper to
the most beautiful things in existence dominates, a quiet area of
attentiveness in which the beautiful and truly important reign. We
must earnestly desire stillness and be willing to give something for
it; then it will be ours. Once we have experienced it, we will be
astounded that we were able to live without it.
Moreover, stillness must not
be superficial, as it is when there is neither speaking nor
squirming; our thoughts, our feelings, our hearts must also find
repose. Then genuine stillness permeates us, spreading ever deeper
through the seemingly plumbless world within.
Once we try to achieve such
profound stillness, we realize that it cannot be accomplished all at
once. The mere desire for it is not enough; we must practice it. The
minutes before Holy Mass are best; but in order to have them for
genuine preparation we must arrive early. They are not a time for
gazing or day-dreaming or for unnecessary thumbing of pages, but for
inwardly collecting and calming ourselves.[2] It would be still
better to begin on our way to church. After all, we are going to a
sacred celebration. Why not let the way there be an exercise in
composure, a kind of overture to what is to come? I would even
suggest that preparation for holy stillness really begins the day
before. Liturgically, Saturday evening already belongs to the
Sunday. If for instance, after suitable reading we were to collect
ourselves for a brief period of composure, its effects the next day
would be evident.
Thus far we have discussed
stillness negatively: no speech, no sound. But it is much more than
the absence of these, a mere gap, as it were, between words and
sounds: stillness itself is something positive. Of course we must be
able to appreciate it as such. There is sometimes a pause in the
midst of a lecture or a service or some public function. Almost
invariably someone promptly coughs or clears his throat. He is
experiencing stillness as a breach in the unwinding road of speech
and sound, which he attempts to fill with something, anything. For
him the stillness was only a lacuna, a void which gave him a sense
of disorder and discomfort. Actually, it is something rich and
brimming.
Stillness is the tranquility
of the inner life; the quiet at the depths of its hidden stream. It
is a collected, total presence, a being "all there,"
receptive, alert, ready. There is nothing inert or oppressive about
it.
Attentiveness that is the
clue to the stillness in question, the stillness before God.
What then is a church? It is,
to be sure, a building having walls, pillars, space. But these
express only part of the word "church," its shell. When we
say that Holy Mass is celebrated "in church," we are
including something more, the congregation. "Congregation,"
not merely people. Churchgoers arriving, sitting, or kneeling in
pews are not necessarily a congregation; they can be simply a
roomful of more or less pious individuals. Congregation is formed
only when those individuals are present not only corporally but also
spiritually, when they have contacted one another in prayer and step
together into the spiritual "space" around them; strictly
speaking, when they have first widened and heightened that space by
prayer. Then true congregation comes into being, which, along with
the building that is its architectural expression, forms the vital
church in which the sacred act is accomplished. All this takes place
only in stillness; out of stillness grows the real sanctuary. It is
important to understand this. Church buildings may be lost or
destroyed; then everything depends on whether or not the faithful
are capable of forming congregations that erect indestructible
"churches" wherever they happen to find themselves, no
matter how poor or dreary their quarters. We must learn and practice
the art of constructing spiritual cathedrals.
We cannot take stillness too
seriously. Not for nothing do these reflections on the liturgy open
with it. If someone were to ask me what the liturgical life begins
with, I should answer: with learning stillness. Without it,
everything remains superficial, vain. Our understanding of stillness
is nothing strange or aesthetic. Were we to approach stillness on
the level of aesthetics of mere withdrawal into the ego we should
spoil everything. What we are striving for is something very grave,
very important, and unfortunately sorely neglected; the prerequisite
of the liturgical holy act.
1. At this point attention
must be drawn to a subject which, though only indirectly related to
this chapter, is nevertheless essential to the book as a whole. We
mentioned moments of stillness in the continuity of the sacred
action; hence the question automatically arises: when do such
moments come into being? There are many forms of the liturgy, but we
are discussing this question in relation to one particular form: to
the spoken (rather than the sung) Mass. But even the spoken Mass has
several forms. Thus when we say that at a certain moment there is
silence, this is meant as a suggestion as to how such a Mass should
be celebrated, and it should be accepted as such, even though it is
impossible in a limited space to present the reasons behind the
suggestion, which must be left to a future opportunity.
First of all, the opening
prayer at the foot of the altar should be prayed silently. In the
recited Mass it is usually spoken aloud by the priest and
congregation. There are certain advantages to this, but when the
practice continues over a long period of time, disadvantages become
apparent. Strictly speaking, the prayer at the foot of the altar
does not really belong to the Mass at all; it is the priest's
personal preparation and formerly was prayed in the sacristy. Its
significance seems clearest when it is prayed in silence in genuine
silence. A similar silence should also fill the brief interval
between each "oremus" and the formal prayer which follows;
there should be a real pause, in which everyone present places his
intentions before God, to be gathered up by the priest in the
oratio. The Offertory, too, should take place in the profoundest
possible stillness. Essentially it is a preparation for the sacred
meal and hence should keep in the background. This is mostly simply
effected by allowing silence to reign from the Offertory to the
Preface, also in the moments after the Agnus Dei and during
Communion. Finally, the Last Gospel is similarly best read silently.
After the "Ite, Missa est" and blessing, the sacred action
is essentially over. The prologue to St. John's Gospel was added
later, for more or less incidental historical reasons.
This order shifts in the sung
Mass: likewise in the High Mass, in which certain texts are sung by
the choir. We cannot go into the question of when silence is best
here; but in the sung Mass, too, periods of stillness are an
absolute necessity. Lengthy, unbroken singing is objectionable, as
is continuous organ music, which drives stillness from its last
possible refuge. In the course of these meditations we shall see
that the periods of silence are not mere interruptions of speech and
song, but something essential to the sacred act as a whole and
almost as important as the periods of speech.
2. The importance of
stillness can hardly be exaggerated. In my book, Wille und Wahrheit
(Mainz, 1938), I attempted to show its significance for our
religious life and for all personal existence, as well as to suggest
how it may be attained. The book also contains other passages
relevant to these meditations.
|