|
Book IV
OF THE DECAY AND RUIN OF CHARITY.
CHAPTER VI. THAT WE OUGHT TO ACKNOWLEDGE ALL THE LOVE WE BEAR TO GOD TO BE FROM GOD.
|
The love of men towards God takes its being, progress and perfection from
the eternal love of God towards men. This is the universal sense of the
Church our mothers who with an ardent jealousy will have us to acknowledge
our salvation and the means thereof, to proceed solely from Our Saviour's
mercy, to the end that on earth as in heaven to him alone may be honour and
glory.
What hast thou that thou hast not received? says the divine Apostle,
speaking of the gifts of knowledge, eloquence, and other like qualities of
Church-pastors; and if thou hast received, why dost thou glory as if thou
hadst not received. [203] It is true; we have received all from God, but
especially the supernatural goods of holy love. And if we have received
them, why should we take the glory of them?
Certainly if any one would extol himself for having made progress in the
love of God: Alas! wretched man, should we say unto him, thou wast aswoon in
thy iniquity, having neither force nor life left in thee to rise (as it
happened to the princess in our parable), [204] and God of his infinite
goodness ran to thy succour, and crying with a loud voice; Open the mouth of
thy attention and I will fill it, [205] he himself put his fingers between
thy lips and unlocked thy teeth, casting into thy heart his holy
inspiration, and thou didst receive it; and when thou wast brought back to
thy senses, he went on by divers movements and various means to strengthen
thy heart, till at length he infused into it his charity, as thy vital and
perfect health.
Well then, tell me now, miserable creature, what hast thou done in all this
of which thou canst boast? Thou didst consent, I know it well; the motion of
thy will did freely follow that of heavenly grace. But all this, what is it
more than to receive the divine operation without resistance? And what is
there in this, that thou hast not received? Yea, poor wretch that thou art,
thou didst receive the receiving in which thou gloriest, and the consent
which thou vauntest: for tell me, I pray thee, wilt thou not grant me, that
if God had not prevented thee, thou wouldst never have perceived his
goodness, and consequently never have consented to his love? No, nor yet
hadst thou thought a single good thought of him. His movement gave being and
life to thine, and if his liberty had not animated, excited and provoked thy
liberty, by the powerful invitations of his sweetness, thy liberty had been
for ever unprofitable to thy salvation. I confess thou didst co-operate with
the inspiration by consenting, but, if thou knowest it not, I teach thee
that thy co-operation took being from the operation of grace and thy
freewill together, yet so, that if grace had not prevented and filled thy
heart with its operation, never had thy heart had either power or will to
co-operate.
But tell me again, I beseech thee, vile and abject man, is it not ridiculous
of thee to think that thou hast a share in the glory of thy conversion
because thou didst not repel the inspiration? Is not this a frenzy of
robbers and tyrants, to pretend they give life to those from whom they do
not take it? And is it not a frantic impiety to think that thou gavest holy
efficacy and living activity to the divine inspiration, because by
resistance thou didst not take it away? We can hinder the effects of
inspiration, but we cannot give it any; it takes its force and virtue from
the divine goodness which is the place of its starting, and not from man's
will the place of its arrival. Should we not be moved to wrath, to hear the
princess of our parable boast that it was she that gave virtue and power to
the cordial waters and other medicines, or that she cured herself, because
if she had not received the remedies which the king gave her and poured into
her mouth (at such time as being half dead there remained hardly any sense
in her), they had had no operation? Yes, might one say to her: ungrateful
that thou art, thou mightest have obstinately refused to receive the
remedies, thou mightest, after thou hadst received them into thy mouth, have
cast them out again, yet for all that it is not true that thou gavest them
force and virtue. This they had as their natural property, thou didst only
consent to receive them, and let them operate; and besides, thou wouldst
never have consented, if the King had not first reinvigorated thee, and then
solicited thee to take them; never hadst thou received them, had not he
assisted thee to receive them, opening thy very mouth with his fingers, and
pouring the potion into it. Art thou not then a monster of ingratitude to
wish to attribute to thyself a benefit which by so many titles thou owest to
thy dear spouse?
The curious little fish, called echeneis, or remora, has indeed the power to
stay or not to stay a ship sailing on the high sea under full sail: but it
has not the power to make it set sail, or proceed or arrive; it can hinder
motion, but cannot give it. Our free-will can stay and hinder the course of
the inspiration and when the favourable gale of God's grace swells the sails
of our soul it is in our power to refuse consent, and thereby to hinder the
effect of the wind's favour: but when our spirit sails along, and makes its
voyage prosperously, it is not we that make the gale of the inspiration blow
for us, nor we that make our sails swell with it, nor we that give motion to
the ship of our heart; but we simply receive the gale sent from heaven,
consent to its motion, and let our ship sail under it, not hindering it by
the remora of our resistance. It is the inspiration then which impresses on
our free-will the happy and sweet influence whereby it not only makes it see
the beauty of good, but also heats, helps, and strengthens it, and moves it
so sweetly that it thus turns and freely flows out towards what is good.
The heavens in spring time prepare the fresh dewdrops, and shower them down
upon the face of the sea, and the mother-pearls that open their shells
receive these drops, which are converted into pearls: but, on the contrary,
the mother-pearls which keep their shells shut do not hinder the dews from
falling upon them, yet they hinder them from falling into them. Now have not
the heavens sent their dew and their influence as much upon the one as the
other mother-pearl? Why then did the one in effect produce its pearl and the
others not? The heavens were as bountiful to that one which remained sterile
as was requisite to empearl and impregnate it with its fair unity, [206] but
it hindered the effect of the heavens' favour, by keeping itself closed and
covered. And as for that which conceived the pearl on receiving the dew, it
has nothing in that work which it did not receive from heaven, not even its
opening whereby it received the dew; for without the touches of the
morning's rays, which did gently excite it, it had not risen up to the
surface of the sea, nor yet opened its shell. Theotimus, if we have any love
for God, his be the honour and glory, who did all in us, and without whom
nothing were done; ours be the profit and obligation. This is the division
his divine goodness makes with us; he leaves us the fruits of his benefits,
and reserves to himself the honour and praise of them; and verily since we
are nothing but by his grace, we ought to be nothing but for his glory.
[203] 1 Cor. iv. 7.
[204] See Book iii. 3.
[205] Ps. lxxx. 11.
[206] i.e. pearl. See p. 82 [Tr.]
|