
Enchiridion On Faith, Hope and Love by Saint Augustine
CHAPTER XXIII
THE REALITY
OF THE RESURRECTION
84.
Now, with respect to the resurrection of the body--and by this I do
not
mean
the cases of resuscitation after which people died again, but a
resurrection to
eternal
life after the fashion of Christ's own body--I have not found a way
to discuss
it
briefly and still give satisfactory answers to all the questions
usually raised about
it.
Yet no Christian should have the slightest doubt as to the fact that
the bodies of
all
men, whether already or yet to be born, whether dead or still to die,
will be
resurrected.
85.
Once this fact is established, then, first of all, comes the question
about
abortive
fetuses, which are indeed "born" in the mother's womb, but
are never so
that
they could be "reborn." For, if we say that there is a
resurrection for them, then
we
can agree that at least as much is true of fetuses that are fully
formed. But, with
regard
to undeveloped fetuses, who would not more readily think that they
perish,
like
seeds that did not germinate?192
But
who, then, would dare to deny--though he would not dare to affirm it
either--that
in the resurrection day what is lacking in the forms of things will
be
filled
out? Thus, the perfection which time would have accomplished will not
be
lacking,
any more than the blemishes wrought by time will still be present.
Nature,
then,
will be cheated of nothing apt and fitting which time's passage would
have
187Ps.
27:1.
188II
Tim. 2:25 (mixed text).
189Cf.
Luke 22:61.
190Cf.
John 20:22, 23.
191This
libellus is included in Augustine's Sermons (LXXI, PL,
38, col. 445-467), to which Possidius
gave
the title De blasphemia in Spiritum Sanctum. English
translation in N-PNF, 1st Series, Vol. VI,
Sermon
XXI, pp. 318-332.
192Sicut
semina quae concepta non fuerint.
brought,
nor will anything remain disfigured by anything adverse and contrary
which
time has wrought. But what is not yet a whole will become whole, just
as
what
has been disfigured will be restored to its full figure.
86.
On this score, a corollary question may be most carefully discussed
by the
most
learned men, and still I do not know that any man can answer it,
namely:
When
does a human being begin to live in the womb? Is there some form of
hidden
life,
not yet apparent in the motions of a living thing? To deny, for
example, that
those
fetuses ever lived at all which are cut away limb by limb and cast
out of the
wombs
of pregnant women, lest the mothers die also if the fetuses were left
there
dead,
would seem much too rash. But, in any case, once a man begins to
live, it is
thereafter
possible for him to die. And, once dead, wheresoever death overtook
him,
I
cannot find the basis on which he would not have a share in the
resurrection of the
dead.
87.
By the same token, the resurrection is not to be denied in the cases
of
monsters
which are born and live, even if they quickly die, nor should we
believe
that
they will be raised as they were, but rather in an amended nature and
free
from
faults. Far be it from us to say of that double-limbed man recently
born in the
Orient--about
whom most reliable brethren have given eyewitness reports and the
presbyter
Jerome, of holy memory, has left a written account193--far
be it from us, I
say,
to suppose that at the resurrection there will be one double man, and
not rather
two
men, as there would have been if they had actually been born twins.
So also in
other
cases, which, because of some excess or defect or gross deformity,
are called
monsters:
at the resurrection they will be restored to the normal human
physiognomy,
so that every soul will have its own body and not two bodies joined
together,
even though they were born this way. Every soul will have, as its
own, all
that
is required to complete a whole human body.
88.
Moreover, with God, the earthly substance from which the flesh of
mortal
man
is produced does not perish. Instead, whether it be dissolved into
dust or ashes,
or
dispersed into vapors and the winds, or converted into the substance
of other
bodies
(or even back into the basic elements themselves), or has served as
food for
beasts
or even men and been turned into their flesh--in an instant of time
this
matter
returns to the soul that first animated it, and that caused it to
become a
man,
to live and to grow.
89.
This earthly matter which becomes a corpse upon the soul's departure
will
not, at the resurrection, be so restored that the parts into which it
was
separated
and which have become parts of other things must necessarily return
to
the
same parts of the body in which they were situated--though they do
return to
the
body from which they were separated. Otherwise, to suppose that the
hair
recovers
what frequent clippings have taken off, or the nails get back what
trimming
has pared off, makes for a wild and wholly unbecoming image in the
minds
of those who speculate this way and leads them thus to disbelieve in
the
resurrection.
But take the example of a statue made of fusible metal: if it were
melted
by heat or pounded into dust, or reduced to a shapeless mass, and an
artist
wished
to restore it again from the mass of the same material, it would make
no
difference
to the wholeness of the restored statue which part of it was remade
of
what
part of the metal, so long as the statue, as restored, had been given
all the
material
of which it was originally composed. Just so, God--an artist who
works in
marvelous
and mysterious ways--will restore our bodies, with marvelous and
mysterious
celerity, out of the whole of the matter of which it was originally
composed.
And it will make no difference, in the restoration, whether hair
returns
to
hair and nails to nails, or whether the part of this original matter
that had
perished
is turned back into flesh and restored to other parts of the body.
The main
thing
is that the providence of the [divine] Artist takes care that nothing
unbecoming
will result.
193Jerome,
Epistle to Vitalis, Ep. LXXII, 2; PL, 22, 674.
Augustine also refers to similar phenomena
in
The City of God, XVI. viii, 2.
90.
Nor does it follow that the stature of each person will be different
when
brought
to life anew because there were differences in stature when first
alive, nor
that
the lean will be raised lean or the fat come back to life in their
former obesity.
But
if this is in the Creator's plan, that each shall retain his special
features and
the
proper and recognizable likeness of his former self--while an
equality of physical
endowment
will be preserved--then the matter of which each resurrection body is
composed
will be so disposed that none shall be lost, and any defect will be
supplied
by
Him who can create out of nothing as he wills.
But
if in the bodies of those rising again there is to be an intelligible
inequality,
such as between voices that fill out a chorus, this will be managed
by
disposing
the matter of each body so to bring men into their place in the
angelic
band
and impose nothing on their senses that is inharmonious. For surely
nothing
unseemly
will be there, and whatever is there will be fitting, and this
because the
unfitting
will simply not be.
91.
The bodies of the saints, then, shall rise again free from blemish
and
deformity,
just as they will be also free from corruption, encumbrance, or
handicap.
Their
facility [facilitas]
will be as complete as their felicity [felicitas].
This is why
their
bodies are called "spiritual," though undoubtedly they will
be bodies and not
spirits.
For just as now the body is called "animate" [animale],
though it is a body
and
not a "spirit" [anima],
so then it will be a "spiritual body," but still a body and
not
a spirit.
Accordingly,
then, as far as the corruption which weighs down the soul and
the
vices through which "the flesh lusts against the spirit"194
are concerned, there
will
be no "flesh," but only body, since there are bodies that
are called "heavenly
bodies."195
This is why it is said, "Flesh and blood
shall not inherit the Kingdom of
God,"
and then, as if to expound what was said, it adds, "Neither
shall corruption
inherit
incorruption."196
What the writer first called "flesh and
blood" he later called
"corruption,"
and what he first called "the Kingdom of God" he then later
called
"incorruption."
But,
as far as the substance of the resurrection body is concerned, it
will even
then
still be "flesh." This is why the body of Christ is called
"flesh" even after the
resurrection.
Wherefore the apostle also says, "What is sown a natural body
[corpus
animale]
rises as a spiritual body [corpus
spirituale]."197
For there will then be such
a
concord between flesh and spirit--the spirit quickening the servant
flesh without
any
need of sustenance therefrom--that there will be no further conflict
within
ourselves.
And just as there will be no more external enemies to bear with, so
neither
shall we have to bear with ourselves as enemies within.
92.
But whoever are not liberated from that mass of perdition (brought to
pass
through the first man) by the one Mediator between God and man, they
will
also
rise again, each in his own flesh, but only that they may be punished
together
with
the devil and his angels. Whether these men will rise again with all
their
faults
and deformities, with their diseased and deformed members--is there
any
reason
for us to labor such a question? For obviously the uncertainty about
their
bodily
form and beauty need not weary us, since their damnation is certain
and
eternal.
And let us not be moved to inquire how their body can be
incorruptible if it
can
suffer--or corruptible if it cannot die. For there is no true life
unless it be lived
in
happiness; no true incorruptibility save where health is unscathed by
pain. But
where
an unhappy being is not allowed to die, then death itself, so to say,
dies not;
and
where pain perpetually afflicts but never destroys, corruption goes
on endlessly.
This
state is called, in the Scripture, "the second death."198
93.
Yet neither the first death, in which the soul is compelled to leave
its
194Gal.
5:17.
195I
Cor. 15:40.
196I
Cor. 15:50.
197I
Cor. 15:44.
198Rev.
2:11; 20:6, 14.
body,
nor the second death, in which it is not allowed to leave the body
undergoing
punishment,
would have befallen man if no one had sinned. Surely, the lightest of
all
punishments will be laid on those who have added no further sin to
that
originally
contracted. Among the rest, who have added further Sins to that one,
they
will
suffer a damnation somewhat more tolerable in proportion to the
lesser degree
of
their iniquity.
|